AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis

642 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 642 indexed citations. Written by William Hill Brown and Thomas J. Mowbray covering the research area of Management Information Systems and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (542 citations), Software (321 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (256 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w79993869 →

Countries where authors are citing AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w79993869.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026