Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population.
Impact in
- Physiology 200
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7960389 →Countries where authors are citing Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population.
This map shows the geographic impact of Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population.
This network shows the impact of Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population..
About Spirometric reference values from a Mediterranean population.
This paper, published in 1986, received 450 indexed citations . Written by Josep Roca, J. Sanchís, A Agustí-Vidal, F Segarra, Daniel Navajas, R. Rodríguez-Roisin, Pere Casán and Susana Sans covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (376 citations), Physiology (200 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (36 citations), Surgery (31 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (27 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7960389.