What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?
Impact in
- Education 408
- Authors
- Andy HargreavesMichael Fullan
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79326402 →Countries where authors are citing What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?
This map shows the geographic impact of What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What's Worth Fighting for in Your School? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What's Worth Fighting for in Your School? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?
This network shows the impact of What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?.
About What's Worth Fighting for in Your School?
This paper, published in 1992, received 464 indexed citations . Written by Andy Hargreaves and Michael Fullan. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (408 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (63 citations), Information Systems and Management (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (35 citations) and Information Systems (26 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79326402.