Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research

877 indexed citations
published 2005
Authors
Bryan Orme

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w79266690 →

Countries where authors are citing Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research.

About Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research

This paper, published in 2005, received 877 indexed citations . Written by Bryan Orme. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (407 citations), Marketing (173 citations) and General Health Professions (118 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w79266690.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026