Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

668 indexed citations
published 2013

Countries where authors are citing Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews.

About Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews

This paper, published in 2013, received 668 indexed citations . Written by Jill Eden, Laura A. Levit, Alfred O. Berg and Sally C. Morton. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (208 citations), General Health Professions (185 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (140 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w78610122.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026