Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan.
- Authors
- Nadeem Iqbal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w78569455 →Countries where authors are citing Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan.
This map shows the geographic impact of Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan.
This network shows the impact of Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan..
About Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research: District Dera Ghazi Khan.
This paper, published in 2015, received 163 indexed citations . Written by Nadeem Iqbal covering the research area of Information Systems and Management and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (115 citations), Information Systems (47 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (16 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w78569455.