Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w78205383 →Countries where authors are citing Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation
This map shows the geographic impact of Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation
This network shows the impact of Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation.
About Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation
This paper, published in 1985, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Michael L. Tushman and Elaine Romanelli. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (834 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (485 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (296 citations), Accounting (266 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (222 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w78205383.