The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market
- Authors
- Lawrence M. Ausubel
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7807156 →Countries where authors are citing The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market
This map shows the geographic impact of The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market
This network shows the impact of The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market.
About The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market
This paper, published in 1991, received 528 indexed citations . Written by Lawrence M. Ausubel covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Marketing and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (349 citations), Finance (299 citations), Accounting (255 citations), Strategy and Management (122 citations) and Marketing (88 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7807156.