Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders
- Authors
- Herb KutchinsStuart A. Kirk
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w77355157 →Countries where authors are citing Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders
This map shows the geographic impact of Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders
This network shows the impact of Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders.
About Making Us Crazy: DSM: The Psychiatric Bible and the Creation of Mental Disorders
This paper, published in 1997, received 328 indexed citations . Written by Herb Kutchins and Stuart A. Kirk covering the research area of Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (191 citations), Philosophy (132 citations) and Social Psychology (79 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w77355157.