Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7717315 →Countries where authors are citing Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination
This network shows the impact of Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination.
About Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination
This paper, published in 1995, received 525 indexed citations . Written by Helen J. Hislop, Barbara A. Connelly and Lucille Daniels. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (213 citations), Biomedical Engineering (161 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (139 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7717315.