Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory

495 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1989, received 495 indexed citations. Written by Nancy Fraser covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (266 citations), Political Science and International Relations (137 citations) and Gender Studies (117 citations). Published in Hypatia.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7673369 →

Countries where authors are citing Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7673369.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026