What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review
- Authors
- Daisy FancourtSaoirse Finn
- Journal
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w76501787 →Countries where authors are citing What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review
This map shows the geographic impact of What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review
This network shows the impact of What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review.
About What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?: A scoping review
This paper, published in 2019, received 438 indexed citations . Written by Daisy Fancourt and Saoirse Finn covering the research area of Social Psychology and Conservation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (195 citations), Conservation (192 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (69 citations). Published in Europe PMC (PubMed Central).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w76501787.