Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors
Impact in
- Physiology 538
- Authors
- H Doll
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w75667877 →Countries where authors are citing Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors
This map shows the geographic impact of Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors
This network shows the impact of Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors.
About Mortality in relation to smoking : 40 years' observations on male British doctors
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by H Doll. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (538 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (344 citations), Oncology (197 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (183 citations) and General Health Professions (148 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w75667877.