Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay

368 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1971, received 368 indexed citations. Written by Arnold C. Harberger covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (281 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (68 citations) and Gender Studies (40 citations). Published in Journal of Economic Literature.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7540211 →

Countries where authors are citing Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7540211.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026