Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments

515 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1987, received 515 indexed citations. Written by G.S. Ladde and V. Lakshmikantham covering the research area of Numerical Analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (465 citations), Numerical Analysis (426 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (106 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w75120692 →

Countries where authors are citing Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations With Deviating Arguments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w75120692.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026