Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity
- Authors
- Dan P. McAdams
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74884387 →Countries where authors are citing Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity
This map shows the geographic impact of Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity
This network shows the impact of Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity.
About Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity
This paper, published in 1985, received 816 indexed citations . Written by Dan P. McAdams. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (332 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (287 citations) and Clinical Psychology (280 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74884387.