Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I.
Impact in
- Plant Science 366
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74831028 →Countries where authors are citing Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I.
This map shows the geographic impact of Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I.
This network shows the impact of Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I..
About Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: I.
This paper, published in 1968, received 748 indexed citations . Written by Dhar Ml, Dhar Mm, Dhawan Bn and C. Ray covering the research area of Plant Science, Complementary and alternative medicine and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (366 citations), Molecular Biology (218 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (160 citations), Pharmacology (152 citations) and Food Science (147 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74831028.