Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74745582 →Countries where authors are citing Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.
This map shows the geographic impact of Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.
This network shows the impact of Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase..
About Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.
This paper, published in 1988, received 516 indexed citations . Written by Seok Seon Kang, Jiemin Zhou and Paul Wong covering the research area of Genetics, Rheumatology and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Rheumatology (447 citations), Surgery (179 citations) and Hematology (128 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74745582.