Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group.
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73938311 →Countries where authors are citing Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group.
This map shows the geographic impact of Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group.
This network shows the impact of Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the classification of pulmonary allograft rejection: Lung Rejection Study Group..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73938311.