Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007.
- Journal
- National Center for Education Statistics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7386868 →Countries where authors are citing Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007.
This map shows the geographic impact of Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007.
This network shows the impact of Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007..
About Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016. NCES 2016-007.
This paper, published in 2016, received 483 indexed citations . Written by Lauren Musu-Gillette, Jennifer A. Robinson, Angelina KewalRamani and Anlan Zhang. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (320 citations), Sociology and Political Science (141 citations) and Safety Research (85 citations). Published in National Center for Education Statistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7386868.