THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH
- Authors
- Lisa M. Ellram
- Journal
- Journal of Business Logistics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7382400 →Countries where authors are citing THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH
This map shows the geographic impact of THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH more than expected).
Fields of papers citing THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH
This network shows the impact of THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH.
About THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH
This paper, published in 1996, received 681 indexed citations . Written by Lisa M. Ellram covering the research area of Strategy and Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (450 citations), Strategy and Management (409 citations) and Marketing (113 citations). Published in Journal of Business Logistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7382400.