Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature

522 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1985, received 522 indexed citations. Written by Philip Kitcher covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and History and Philosophy of Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (245 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (243 citations) and Cultural Studies (85 citations). Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7372190 →

Countries where authors are citing Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7372190.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026