Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches
Impact in
- Education 2.9k
Classified as
- Authors
- John W. CreswellCheryl Poth
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73565796 →Countries where authors are citing Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches
This map shows the geographic impact of Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches
This network shows the impact of Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches.
About Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches
This paper, published in 2017, received 9.2k indexed citations . Written by John W. Creswell and Cheryl Poth covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (2.9k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Social Psychology (865 citations) and General Health Professions (791 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73565796.