The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States
- Journal
- Business and Economics Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7320743 →Countries where authors are citing The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States
This map shows the geographic impact of The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States
This network shows the impact of The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States.
About The Relationship Between Working Capital Management And Profitability: Evidence From The United States
This paper, published in 2010, received 418 indexed citations . Written by Amarjit Gill, Nahum Biger and N. D. Mathur covering the research area of Accounting and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (397 citations), Strategy and Management (115 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (66 citations). Published in Business and Economics Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7320743.