Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case
- Authors
- Leroy P. JonesIl SaKong
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73095722 →Countries where authors are citing Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case
This map shows the geographic impact of Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case
This network shows the impact of Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case.
About Government, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case
This paper, published in 1980, received 253 indexed citations . Written by Leroy P. Jones and Il SaKong covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (128 citations), Economics and Econometrics (89 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (71 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73095722.