Type II superconductivity
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73034919 →Countries where authors are citing Type II superconductivity
This map shows the geographic impact of Type II superconductivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Type II superconductivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Type II superconductivity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Type II superconductivity
This network shows the impact of Type II superconductivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Type II superconductivity.
About Type II superconductivity
This paper, published in 1969, received 607 indexed citations . Written by D. Saint‐James, G. Sarma, Edward Thomas and Peter J. Silverman covering the research area of Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Condensed Matter Physics (516 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (241 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (188 citations), Biomedical Engineering (88 citations) and Geophysics (41 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73034919.