The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism

281 indexed citations
published 1951
Journal
Philosophy

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7299230 →

Countries where authors are citing The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism.

About The religion of China : confucianism and Taoism

This paper, published in 1951, received 281 indexed citations . Written by Max Weber and Hans H. Gerth covering the research area of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (182 citations), Political Science and International Relations (70 citations) and Demography (46 citations). Published in Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7299230.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026