Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72967465 →Countries where authors are citing Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity.
This map shows the geographic impact of Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity.
This network shows the impact of Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity..
About Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity.
This paper, published in 1990, received 869 indexed citations . Written by Elliott Foucar, Juan Rosaí and R F Dorfman covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (817 citations), Infectious Diseases (621 citations) and Oncology (443 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72967465.