Ego development : [conceptions and theories]
- Authors
- Jane Loevinger
- Journal
- Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72892376 →Countries where authors are citing Ego development : [conceptions and theories]
This map shows the geographic impact of Ego development : [conceptions and theories]. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ego development : [conceptions and theories] with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ego development : [conceptions and theories] more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ego development : [conceptions and theories]
This network shows the impact of Ego development : [conceptions and theories]. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ego development : [conceptions and theories].
About Ego development : [conceptions and theories]
This paper, published in 1976, received 508 indexed citations . Written by Jane Loevinger covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (285 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (197 citations) and Education (131 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72892376.