Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study.
- Authors
- Gaston GodinJean Jobin
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72685171 →Countries where authors are citing Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study.
This map shows the geographic impact of Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study.
This network shows the impact of Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study..
About Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study.
This paper, published in 1987, received 574 indexed citations . Written by Gaston Godin and Jean Jobin covering the research area of Physiology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Psychology (194 citations), Physiology (178 citations) and Oncology (165 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72685171.