Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants

388 indexed citations
published 1990
Journal
UNESCO eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7221012 →

Countries where authors are citing Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants.

About Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants

This paper, published in 1990, received 388 indexed citations . Written by Kamaljit S. Bawa and Malcolm Hadley covering the research area of Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (244 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (235 citations), Plant Science (135 citations), Ecology (91 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (50 citations). Published in UNESCO eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7221012.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact