A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique
- Authors
- R. S. HusseyK. R. Barker
- Journal
- The Plant disease reporter
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7187600 →Countries where authors are citing A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique
This map shows the geographic impact of A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique
This network shows the impact of A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique.
About A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique
This paper, published in 1973, received 2.1k indexed citations . Written by R. S. Hussey and K. R. Barker covering the research area of Plant Science and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (2.0k citations), Insect Science (311 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (193 citations). Published in The Plant disease reporter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7187600.