[The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status].
- Authors
- Yára Juliano
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w71481616 →Countries where authors are citing [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status].
This map shows the geographic impact of [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status].. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status]. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status]. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status].
This network shows the impact of [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status].. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status]..
About [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status].
This paper, published in 1994, received 920 indexed citations . Written by Yára Juliano covering the research area of General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (347 citations), General Health Professions (194 citations) and Physiology (169 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w71481616.