Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations
- Authors
- Erica Fudge
- Journal
- Radical philosophy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7071096 →Countries where authors are citing Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations
This map shows the geographic impact of Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations
This network shows the impact of Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations.
About Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations
This paper, published in 2001, received 364 indexed citations . Written by Erica Fudge covering the research area of Geography, Planning and Development. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geography, Planning and Development (283 citations), Genetics (129 citations) and Ecology (103 citations). Published in Radical philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7071096.