Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches
- Authors
- Jane Elliott
- Journal
- Sage eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6934925 →Countries where authors are citing Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches
This map shows the geographic impact of Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches
This network shows the impact of Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches.
About Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches
This paper, published in 2005, received 647 indexed citations . Written by Jane Elliott. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (265 citations), Education (170 citations), General Health Professions (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (65 citations) and Gender Studies (61 citations). Published in Sage eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6934925.