Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis
- Authors
- Jason W. Osborne
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6898270 →Countries where authors are citing Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis
This network shows the impact of Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis.
About Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Jason W. Osborne covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Social Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (332 citations), Social Psychology (329 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (323 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6898270.