The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management
- Journal
- Blackwell eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6877942 →Countries where authors are citing The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management
This map shows the geographic impact of The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management
This network shows the impact of The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management.
About The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management
This paper, published in 2003, received 658 indexed citations . Written by Marjorie A. Lyles and Mark Easterby‐Smith. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (346 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (221 citations) and Communication (175 citations). Published in Blackwell eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6877942.