Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.
- Journal
- The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68511361 →Countries where authors are citing Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.
This map shows the geographic impact of Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.
This network shows the impact of Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation..
About Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.
This paper, published in 2001, received 633 indexed citations . Written by Judith A. Blake, John Corradi, Janan T. Eppig, David P. Hill, Joel E. Richardson and Martin Ringwald covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (532 citations), Artificial Intelligence (103 citations) and Genetics (68 citations). Published in The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68511361.