Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason

511 indexed citations
published 2003
Authors
Ted Benton

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6838531 →

Countries where authors are citing Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason.

About Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason

This paper, published in 2003, received 511 indexed citations . Written by Ted Benton. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (172 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (144 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (84 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (83 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (73 citations). Published in Radical philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6838531.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact