Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68332153 →Countries where authors are citing Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation
This map shows the geographic impact of Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation
This network shows the impact of Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation.
About Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program -- Final Impacts Evaluation
This paper, published in 2011, received 256 indexed citations . Written by Lisa Sanbonmatsu, Jens Ludwig, Lawrence F. Katz, Lisa A. Gennetian, Greg J. Duncan, Ronald C. Kessler, Emma K. Adam, Thomas W. McDade and Stacy Tessler Lindau covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (201 citations), General Health Professions (113 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (76 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68332153.