Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects
- Authors
- Richard RomanoDennis Epple
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6703376 →Countries where authors are citing Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects
This map shows the geographic impact of Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects
This network shows the impact of Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects.
About Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects
This paper, published in 1998, received 532 indexed citations . Written by Richard Romano and Dennis Epple covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (367 citations), Economics and Econometrics (241 citations), Sociology and Political Science (172 citations), Safety Research (75 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (64 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6703376.