Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66582872 →Countries where authors are citing Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action
This map shows the geographic impact of Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action
This network shows the impact of Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action.
About Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action
This paper, published in 1998, received 811 indexed citations . Written by Suzanne B. Buck, Sam F. Victory, Richard H. Himes and Gunda I. Georg covering the research area of Oncology, Neurology and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (553 citations), Molecular Biology (300 citations) and Cell Biology (275 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66582872.