National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66399561 →Countries where authors are citing National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.
This map shows the geographic impact of National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.
This network shows the impact of National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010..
About National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.
This paper, published in 2013, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Michele Chiappa, Kathryn S Porter, Yechiam Ostchega and Brenda G. Lewis covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (320 citations), Physiology (224 citations) and Epidemiology (174 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66399561.