Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement
Impact in
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66311732 →Countries where authors are citing Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement
This map shows the geographic impact of Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement
This network shows the impact of Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement.
About Cmmi: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement
This paper, published in 2003, received 506 indexed citations . Written by Mary Beth Chrissis, Mike Konrad and Sandy Shrum. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (337 citations), Management Information Systems (183 citations), Software (87 citations), Artificial Intelligence (77 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (53 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66311732.