Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management

1.4k indexed citations
published 1995
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w65806390 →

Countries where authors are citing Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management.

About Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management

This paper, published in 1995, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Joseph R. Duffy covering the research area of Speech and Hearing and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (767 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (529 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (434 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w65806390.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026