Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.

623 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1993, received 623 indexed citations. Written by Homayoun Vaziri, François Schächter, Irene A. Uchida, Lixin Wei, Xiao‐Feng Zhu, Rita B. Effros and Daniel Cohen covering the research area of Epidemiology and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (511 citations), Molecular Biology (228 citations) and Immunology (126 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w64767833 →

Countries where authors are citing Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w64767833.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026