Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?
- Authors
- James Andreoni
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6450813 →Countries where authors are citing Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?
This map shows the geographic impact of Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?
This network shows the impact of Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?.
About Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?
This paper, published in 1995, received 530 indexed citations . Written by James Andreoni covering the research area of Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (429 citations), Sociology and Political Science (226 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (174 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6450813.