Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events

444 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 444 indexed citations. Written by Donald Getz covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (380 citations), Gender Studies (129 citations) and Social Psychology (107 citations). Published in Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w64438138 →

Countries where authors are citing Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w64438138.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026