Geometric Programming : Theory and Application
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
- Computational Mechanics
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w63916581 →Countries where authors are citing Geometric Programming : Theory and Application
This map shows the geographic impact of Geometric Programming : Theory and Application. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geometric Programming : Theory and Application with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geometric Programming : Theory and Application more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Geometric Programming : Theory and Application
This network shows the impact of Geometric Programming : Theory and Application. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Geometric Programming : Theory and Application.
About Geometric Programming : Theory and Application
This paper, published in 1967, received 429 indexed citations . Written by R. J. Duffin, Elmor L. Peterson and Clarence Zener covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Control and Systems Engineering (137 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (128 citations) and Numerical Analysis (114 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w63916581.