Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010.

406 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 406 indexed citations. Written by Jeannine S. Schiller, Jacqueline W Lucas, Brian Ward and Jennifer Peregoy covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 citations), General Health Professions (95 citations) and Physiology (90 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w63277729 →

Countries where authors are citing Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w63277729.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026